Posts Tagged ‘Patriot Act’

Federal Agent or Drug Dealer

July 17, 2009

Wednesday this week. I arrived early at work to find a truck parked in front of my wife’s business and as I arrived the occupant opened the car door to throw some litter on the ground. So naturally being the Fatsavage that I am, I threw a rant outside the occupant’s car door about what right did he have to litter in my front yard. I insisted he tell me where he live so I could go to his house and throw litter all over his yard. After awhile, I notice that the tint on the truck windows was so dark that I couldn’t even identify the race or features of the person I was talking too.

What I did notice was the glow of an eye level laptop pointed towards my nemesis in the drivers seat professionally mounted on some sort of platform on the passenger side and that the person had a princess sized hand set from a phone that he was holding too his ear (like a radio phone). Since he had not yet shot me or got out of his vehicle, prudence dictated I move on.

Well I chatted with one of my Police friends about whether I was dealing with a drug dealer or an undercover Federal Agent and he opted for the latter.

As he pointed out, no self respecting drug dealer would be driving a dented pick-up truck as they preferred more sporty models.

Also, the local police had been hounding the drug dealers with tinted windows as a method to make targeted car stops and removal of the illegal tint.

Finally, no self respecting drug dealer would have put up with my verbal crap. He simply would have shot me in the knee cap and moved on down the road.

In his mind, I definitely had a Federal Agent of some kind observing me.

For some of my resent discoveries on domestic spying, check out tigerstail.wordpress.com.

Feds on The Run!

April 21, 2009

There is nothing more dangerous than a wounded boar (Wild Pig). They have tusks to kill, and incisors that tear the flesh from the bone. Hunting the wild boar is not a task for the weak at heart. Likewise it’s probably not too wise to piss off Federal Agents. I doubt that there is a formal written policy of domestic spying and holding people for an indeterminate term without a sentence, but when someone makes a rouge decision, those in command can either over rule the decision or ignore it and look the other way. It thus becomes sort of impossible to know how many or how few people are involved in illegal activities, how many illegal acts are taking place or who initiated them.

Now Charles Stephano’s appeal is based on the perjury of Federal Witnesses and is wicked at best. The Judge is past retirement date and way in the hither lands so he can either do the right thing or simply look the other way for another six months and dump it in the lap of his replacement. Meanwhile, Mr. Stephano is developing some potentially dangerous health issues so if the Feds just wait long enough, he could die and the whole sordid affair will be over. So it’s hard to figure out why anyone would do something very stupid in the affairs of Mr. Stephano and I guess this is just another area of the Federal Criminal Justice System that we will never figure out.

In the words of Mr. Stephano:

I received correspondence from my Legal Representative, Return Address “Law Office of Martial Webster, Attorney at Law.” It was a legal envelope clearly addressed thusly:

LEGAL MAIL

Charles Stephano

Reg. No. etc. etc.

Now legal Mail is considered “By the rules and by the book” as sacrosanct as the Diplomatic Pouch. Even a modicum of intelligence would dictate that legal mail is privileged in the legal sense. Guests of these Federal Detention Centers enjoy few privileges. After all they ait here to receive the Medal of Honor! One of these few privileges is the right to 100% private 2-way communications with their lawyer. This is a Law in itself: A Federal Law. People just don’t go about breaking federal laws willy-nilly, or do they?

My clearly marked legal mail had been opened before I saw or received it. Regular mail is regularly read by these federal employees – outgoing or incoming. I have no problem with that. But, my legal mail (Being Clearly identified as such) was opened, read and maybe even copied prior to my receipt of same. I’ve gone on record in protest of this clear violation or my rights.

The unfortunate little detail left out by Stephano is that he has been incarcerated in a Federal prision for more than two years without either having had his right to an appeal or even being sentaced to a specific term. Oh well maybe the Feds will get lucky and he will die in jail so they never have to defend their abuses of power.

Jill Trumbull-Harris, Story Teller

April 20, 2009

“Oh what a wicked web we weave

When first we practice to deceive”

“But then when we have practiced quite a while

how vastly we improve our style”.

“Success at trials can be child’s play

when willing to lie to win the day.”

When Little Jill and her Professor wrote the book on Mock Trials, even though she was not yet a lawyer, the authors were very careful to describe the need to be ethical while developing the story to be told at trial. There was not even a hint that a Lawyer or Law Student should ever tamper with witnesses or evidence or suborn perjury. Their method allows for being selective in the evidence and witnesses presented in support of the story, but officially frowns on truly unethical acts.

In some cases it’s really not necessary to alter the story of a person who wants to be the hero in saving the community from some dastardly villain. Once the hero learns the most important facts (which can be transmitted by a skillful interviewer who is guiding the questioning with smiles and frowns), a smart hero will pick up on the story he is supposed to tell and adapt his story accordingly so he can remain the hero.

Our Technician who discovered the kiddie porn on the computer didn’t need much guidance to develop a story compatible with the story Little Jill was trying to develop. Initially he kept on trying to tell his version of the truth at the suppression of evidence hearing but did manage to get most of his “facts” in line with the story by trial.

The biggest flaw was that he was testifying way beyond his scope of expertise. Mr Aloyo described himself as an A+ certified entry-level technician who works in a position to diagnoses and repairs computers. In no way does this qualify him to testify on the nature, appearance or cause of popup windows and browsers. Yet he said that the porn was on a browser and not a popup. Aloyo has no proven or even self proclaimed expertise in scripting for the Internet so could not make that determination. He assumed, as an armature might, that a popup is one of those miserable advertising boxes which can only be closed by clicking on the “X” in the box on the upper right. In fact the javascript code to open a whole new window involves changing the word “no” to “yes” seven times which is certainly no great programming feat. So the same code that creates advertising popups also can be used to create spawned porn browsers.

The code for a pornloader can be found here. It is not the best, it is not the worse, it is simply one that works and proves that full fledged browser can be made to pop-up all over the place. There are no porn pictures of any type used in this demonstration. It is completely safe (although annoying) and will also prove that pop-up pages do register in index.dat files and that images will be stored in cache image folders whether you requested the images or not. When browser pages load in the index.dat file you can’t tell for the most part whether it was a spawned browser, someone clicked a link or someone typed in a URL. (For this demonstration to work, the popup blocker must be turned off.)

I don’t believe Little Jill asked Aloyo to lie, I believe it just came easy for him with a little guidance from Jill.

Jill Trumbull Harris, the Pied Piper of Witnesses

April 7, 2009

You really should check the original version of both the Pied Piper Story and Trial Advocacy to see how close I stick to the title. I will get to the Pied Piper in a moment, but a pretty close description of trial advocacy is presented as it was written by Jill Trumbull Harris in a previous post.

Now her story told about Stephano was 100% consistent. The old man lived in a pig sty that only a mentally ill person could endure. He lived alone and spent every waking moment typing in URL’s of kiddie porn sites where he intentionally downloaded 40,000 porn pictures of which, 600 were readily identified as kiddie porn. This deranged 64 year old man took time to learn everything about computer security in the two months he owned the machine, his machine was fully protected and he never got hit by pornloaders or was unintentionally redirected to a site which had kiddie porn. He was just a disgusting dirty old man who liked looking at kiddie porn and if he would stop, no one would ever molest a child again as there would be no profit motive if people stopped paying for porn.

Now the problem with the story is that it never fit the facts. Obviously this deranged old man had no credit cards or memberships at pay per view sites and never used a chat room. But some evidence was on Jill’s side and that was the pictures. Every time the defense would discredit her case, she would show a few hundred really nasty pictures and the video of the horrific dump Stephano lived in. Over and over the jury was told that possession of only one picture was a criminal offense but he possessed 600. Now if the story were tried strictly on the thesis, it would be tough to beat. Unfortunately, there was a complete body of evidence that contradicted her story.

According to Jill, it is permissible to minimize evidence and contradict witnesses when they contradict your story as long as it’s done in an ethical manner. However, the question which will be explored is about suborning perjury under the guise of Homeland Security and the Protected Critical Information Infrastructure Act.

Now as the Pied Piper, Jill Trumbull Harris came to St. Croix to protect the community from perverts if only the witnesses would help her develop her story and remember things her way. It’s hard to know what siren song she sang that mesmerized her witnesses it to mindlessly following her story line and failing to tell the simple truth when asked a direct question.

It appears that Stephano’s attorney has finally presented an appeal that leaves the judge with a Faustian dilemma. The appeal is based on blatant and provable perjury. If he grants the appeal, perjury charges should follow and be directed at federally employed agents and expert witnesses.

Now Jill got a promotion and is probably above the law so it will be interesting to see who is blamed for the perjured testimony. However like the Pied Piper she will flee our community forever and leave us with memories of  her dastardly deed.

Success??

October 9, 2008

I can’t believe it.  Young-models.org is actually offline.  I have hammered this site for 18 months identifying hosting and backbone carriers and even companies profiting from kiddie porn. This is one nasty and very well protected kiddie porn site that has been protected by the government for about 5 years and it’s finally down. Good riddance!!

Is this just a temporary ploy to reintroduce Bush/McCain as the new McCain/Palin moral majority to divert attention from the economic collapse of the Republic of Texas formally know as the United States of America??

Stock Review – LVLT- Level 3 Communications

July 24, 2008

Since I started writing in this blog again, I started reviewing old posts and one of the things I was curious about was how jaded is Wall Street.

One of the first players I identified in the Kiddie Porn Industry was Level 3 Communications with the following post. At the time the stock price was $6.26 and it’s easy enough to check both the blog date and stock price. Level 3 was identified as a key player in delivering kiddie porn including the establishment of direct cable to the Host and corporate acquisitions which facilitated Kiddie porn delivery.

The Players: Level 3

April 6, 2007

About six weeks later, I did a post on the government protection of and subsidies for Kiddie porn and once again identified Level 3 as a beneficiary of these subsidies. The stock price was $5.36 per share.

Your Tax Dollar’s at Work?

May 15, 2007

On Septemnber 11, 2007, when the price had declined to $4.72, I clearly identified Level 3 as a direct investment in Kiddie porn.

Level 3 – An Investment in Kiddie Porn!

September 11, 2007 4.72

Since that time the stock has declined to $3.11 or less than half when first identified as a kiddie porn supplier or a drop of over 50%. As a benchmark, the Dow industrials have dropped less than half suffering about a 20% loss.

Now before Wall Street gets too smug and starts basking in moral superiority, I might point out that 94% of all their stock is still institutional holdings and still in your pension fund.

So who’s profiting from Kiddie Porn?

You probably are!

Independence Day

July 22, 2008

This case reminds me of the movie “Independence Day” where the space ship lays dormant for 50 years and all of a sudden jumps to life. Well, this hasn’t taken quite as long. I stopped writing in April and and nothing much happened with traffic dwindling down to 40 hits a day. Actually, I surprised it was that much with no new posts and Google content filtering there was very little reason for even my most devoted fans to come back. Then last week all hell broke loose on all fronts.

The lawyer for the defense called. He had a virus which he and his trial expert didn’t know how to get rid of. I mean, that’s sick. Here we have the trial of this century invoking the Patriot Act, Protected lying Federal witnesses, planted evidence and a mockery of a trial and the lawyer and his expert can’t protect a computer from a virus or get rid of it once it’s infected. The lawyer on this case is a fucking disgrace but that’s another story.

This provoked me to check my blog and all of a sudden I find my traffic has jumped four fold and I found the reason why. Apparently, the feds have a new tactic in kiddie porn prosecutions. instead of fighting my blog, they and Google seem to have embraced it as a weapon in the war on kiddie porn. When you now Google a kiddie porn site, I have commented on or even visit Alexa to find out about it my comments are well represented in the top 10. Actually, this is a smart move on the part of the Feds. Regular readers know that this blog has documented all the involuntary ways to get kiddie porn on your computer. But for true perverts, that defense is gone.

I mean, if you Google young-models.org and still go there after reading comments that the site is illegal, deserved to be nuked and is blatant born in America kiddie porn from the Federal Archives, you not only deserve to go to jail but deserve to go to hell as well.

The Judge Responds

April 22, 2008

After a lifetime of public service, Judge Finch has decided to retire but he is still working until the very end of his career and beyond. He will remain a part time Judge after his nominal retirement date of August, 2008. Thus, I am really surprised at the speed of his response. His reply was dictated on April 14, 2008 for a document he recieved on April 10, 2008.

His response is as follows:

April 14, 2008

Dear [FatSavage]:

Thank you for your letter of April 8, 2008.

Since this letter is not properly before the Court as part of its proceedings, I am forced to return the same to you.

Thank you for your attention in this regard.

Sincerely,

Raymond L. Finch

The letter is obviously in standard form English which is why I’m surprised to find that I am clueless as to what the hell he means. Since the judge knows me personally and we occasionally bump into each other, I’ll have to ask him privately when I see him again. (not very often)

Oh well after a year of study, I could live with a clear cut loss or better yet, a win but in my mind, an indeterminate term in purgatory with no decision is worse than an eternity in hell.