Archive for the ‘porn’ Category

The Judge Responds

April 22, 2008

After a lifetime of public service, Judge Finch has decided to retire but he is still working until the very end of his career and beyond. He will remain a part time Judge after his nominal retirement date of August, 2008. Thus, I am really surprised at the speed of his response. His reply was dictated on April 14, 2008 for a document he recieved on April 10, 2008.

His response is as follows:

April 14, 2008

Dear [FatSavage]:

Thank you for your letter of April 8, 2008.

Since this letter is not properly before the Court as part of its proceedings, I am forced to return the same to you.

Thank you for your attention in this regard.

Sincerely,

Raymond L. Finch

The letter is obviously in standard form English which is why I’m surprised to find that I am clueless as to what the hell he means. Since the judge knows me personally and we occasionally bump into each other, I’ll have to ask him privately when I see him again. (not very often)

Oh well after a year of study, I could live with a clear cut loss or better yet, a win but in my mind, an indeterminate term in purgatory with no decision is worse than an eternity in hell.

A Final Chapter????

April 9, 2008

Dear Reader,

I am posting a copy of the cover letter for a package that I have sent to Judge Raymond Finch documenting Shannon Perkins perjury. Pretty much it proves what regular visitors to this blog already know: Federal Expert Witnesses lie to get a conviction, and the Attorney on this case is a fuck-up. Meanwhile Charles Stephano rots in Jail and the expert moves on to bigger and better cases.

The principle point I would like to convey to all is that computer evidence is not immutable when presented by the Feds. You can find evidence of keystroke loggers, spyware and shutdown programs. You can also find the trail of planted evidence. If you can explore all of this “secret information” at a trial and the expert lies to get a conviction, you stand an excellent chance of using the logs to find evidence of perjury and also setting up for a dismissal or retrial if you don’t win.

I will probably pass this along to CNN and the Electronic Freedom Foundation to see if they can bring this type of prosecution to the light of day. While it’s common knowledge in our community among Judges and Lawyers that Federal Experts lie, I believe the general public doesn’t even dream of how widespread and pervasive the practice is.

At any rate, I have worked on this for about a year and am bored with it. As I have unfortunately discovered; resistance is futile, knowledge is soporific.

Sincerely,

The FatSavage

PS I’m glad I’m old – it really does make it easier to cope with the Brave New World of electronic surveillance of all Americans

Google Dorking 4 Kiddie Porn

February 11, 2008

When you Google Dork for porn, you can never be quite sure of the result you will get and not all Google based searches are created equal.  Now while Google dorking for kiddie porn sites with one search I did hit the mother load of hundreds of sites where every page of 10 results had a warning at the bottom of the page that some pages had been removed because of kiddie porn complaints.  When I clicked on the complete URL, most pages came up dead ends or redirected to advertising content.  However, when I just put the main domain name in the URL locator, many of the sites showed suspiciously young girls with a disclaimer they were all 18 and many had a ucj cookie the sames as other “go to jail” type sites. Usually, a page would yield three  domains suspected of hosting Kiddie Porn.

I thought that the search was;

site:*/cgi-bin/ucj/

Now the reason I couldn’t initially repeat the experiment was because when I went back I tried to play it safe. I went to scroogle.org and did my annomyuous surfing only to turn up a list of crap domains which took you to them phony advertising dumps. Next, I used Firefox and killed all cookies only to get the same list of crap.

I tried Lynx on a live cd and got a very evil list but I was forced to yield to cookies to get in.  Well, once your screwed, you may as well go all the way.  When, I allowed cookies in the machine, bam I was back to the Mother of all Kiddie Porn Portals – straight from the fine folks at Google.

The only problem is they will have this search and my cookies on file until 2038 when it finally expires. 

You know you can trust Google to give you any result you want.  You just can’t do it annomyously.

Beyond Google – Viral Traffic

February 6, 2008

If your discussing matters which are touchy to our government, you really have to expect their best effort at suppressing the information. It’s no secret that Google is cooperating with China in suppressing knowledge on a broad range of topics. It’s also obvious that as a socially responsible corporation, they probably hide or fail to list content on a broad range of topics. When they fail to list a site page, they sometimes let you know that the supporting documentation is at chillingeffects.org but only when the content is totally illegal.

For legal but sensitive material, they don’t really acknowledge content filtering but when caught, just release a statement about unintended errors which led to technical difficulties and an inability to find a specific YouTube movie etc. In our particular case, serious content filtering started at my Fatsavage blog with a condemnation of a known kiddie porn site, youngerbabes.com, which is still online. The technical proof of content filtering is offered on this blog.

Of course the immediate effect of content filtering is that your traffic gets slammed and you lose visitors, but there is an obvious solution, just keep on writing. My traffic at fatsavage has started rising again, and the site is ranked in the top million of 20 million sites monitored by quantcast.com. Yeah, I get more traffic if I avoid censored topics, but I’m not a singing caged bird.

Interestingly, my new exulted status is almost independent of Google referrals (Correlation Coefficient 33%) and much more dependent on loyal visitors.

This post is being published at both Fatsavge and Tigerstail Blogs, not because I’m lazy, but because I want the information to get out. If Google were bothering to feed my blog, this would almost certainly get this post de-listed for laziness or plagiarism. However, since they are no longer doing a great job for my traffic, it doesn’t matter which rules I break.

Google Content Filtering is Specific!

February 1, 2008

You might expect that a search engine developed by a brilliant guy (Sergi Brin) attending a fantastic school (Stanford) would be cerebral and that is the case. College professors who study such things say the top 5 posts on any search term at Google are far superior in content, spelling and grammar than the bottom and that fresh verbal content gives a higher rating than superior graphics.

With this in mind, it’s easy to see how the Fatsavage blog makes it up to the top ten when discussing kiddie porn. After all, there is very little poetic prose or any kind of prose at all. The vocabulary is quite restricted and in the range that a chimpanzee could learn. Youngerbabes.com has about 250 unique words on the home page and a well educated chimp can have a vocabulary between 250 and 500 words.

Still, this is a site which is in the top 4300 in the world and about the same as thehun.net (3900) or elephantlist.com (3200) which are clearly legal porn portals. Putting this popularity into numbers, one million people a month visit this site and about 4000 are addicted enough to visit daily. (Don’t worry, I’m sure there all being observed and will get a visit from the man in the near future.) Joking aside, that happens to be about the number of child pornography cases tried each year, so you do know where they find them.

Thus, it’s easy to conceive that a highly negative post about youngerbabes.com gets about about 1000 hits in the two days after posting before it is filtered out of existence and never gets more than one or two a day after that. My two favorite and very popular rants which got virtually no traffic after the first three days are:

Youngerbabes Suck Bad

Youngerbabes, A curse on everyone Involved!

Of course, linking to them will relegate this post to Search Siberia, despite the interest in the subject. Seems to me if the Government and Google really wanted to restrict access to illegal kiddie porn, there would be a bigger effort to get out the word on youngerbabes.com

On the other hand, if this is a government Honeypot tracking domestic and foreign nationals, then there would be a very focused effort to filter out negative comments which warn people off.

Well, it’s your life so you can decide.

Google Hacking For Kiddie Porn!

January 29, 2008

In order to really use Google Hacking techniques, you have to have a knowledge base that directs your search and helps you recognize when you reach a destination. While checking on hq-teens.com to see if the are still on line feeding images of abused anorexic young girls (they are), I also checked the source code and was reminded of the ucj cookie and cgi image feed.

Since all the images are fed from links containing a /ucj/ directory, I figured I’d do a long shot and Google

link:*/ucj/* which amazingly worked better than the Google “site” or “inurl” commands and led to two sites. One was a dead kiddie porn site and the other http://www.ucj.com Interestingly this is a site which cannot be explored through the front door because entry is blocked to the home page. The page I found is a manual for the ucj porn delivery system and the backdoor is wide open.

The URL, http://www.ucj.com/docs/ucj45/c.html is still live and for those who care you can move up the directory tree by eliminating the c.html and then the ucj45 drectory until you reach docs where you are once again are shut out. Now recognizing the weak link, you can explore the site with

site:ucj.com and find

http://www.ucj.com/features.html which takes you to a list of 1951 porn sites some of which contain kiddie porn because some known kiddie porn sites are on the list.

Now searching through 1951 sites for kiddie porn is a pretty inefficient uses of time but this line of thought allowed me to target my Google Search and zero in on the really nasty sites with one simple entry into the search bar.

Google Content Filtering!

January 27, 2008

Once again, I seemed to have pissed a lot of important people off. My site traffic dropped by over 70% and I was curious as to why. I had written a few insulting posts on Prosecutor Jill Trumbull-Harris (with a few more to come). Google lists one in the top ten, MSN has two, Yahoo is the top 3 and Ask has zero. Traffic is steady but weak and those who have a need can find the information.

Likewise I checked traffic and and rankings for young-models.org which is a kiddie porn site and had top ten listings in Yahoo, Ask and Google. Once again, I couldn’t see any evidence of content filtering.

Life got really interesting when I checked on youngerbabes.com! Now it seems once again, I got slammed with a huge drop in traffic on my most recent posting which coincided with a huge drop in Google referrals. The last time this happened, I had not yet figured out how to prove that it was content filtering. Now I am presenting the supportive mathematical arguments at tigerstail.wordpress.com

It’s not like I’m really opposed to content filtering. It’s pretty obvious that a manual on purifying uranium and building a nuclear weapon is not going to be online. On the other hand, why would anyone want to block a Christmas wish to Charles Stephano or warnings that youngerbabes.com is a really nasty kiddie porn site. (first blocked post)

Aboutus.org Kiddie Porn Portal

January 19, 2008

I love it when old standbys reinvent themselves and start sailing in uncharted waters. Seems that aboutus.org used to be a source of information driven by a community wiki. Now they are using their database to create Internet portals for businesses and the porn industry has the most to spend on self promotion. In order to appear non commercial, they are calling these categories “Category” and the syntax is

http://www.aboutus.org/Category:Your_Interest

So while I was doing a Google background check on a potential kiddie porn site I found a listing for

www.aboutus.org/Category:Cheerleaders

Now being the suspicious sort, I Googled Cheerleader and it was all Pro-football teams stuff and on the first few pages there were not many links to porn of any kind. So, I immediately clicked the above link and found 890 sites listed many with porn like names and quite a few with go to jail type names. I’m not sure how many were American made (I Checked and some were) and how many were promoting illegal kiddie porn (I Checked and some were).

Unbelievable the access to porn didn’t stop there. I noticed at the top of the page a link to Teens and took it only to be told that these were adult sites and I would have to be a registered user to find their names although I doubt that the sites could be worse than those listed under Cheerleaders. I tried “Porn” and entered another restricted area but then went to the list of go to jail search terms mentioned at trial.

www.aboutus.org/Category:Young_Models linked to 118 page reviews of mostly porn sites but

www.aboutus.org/Category:Lolita delivered the mother load of Kiddie porn with over 1200 entries. I never got beyond looking at the list as I had already seen enough with the Cheerleaders.

I wonder if Aboutus.org has figured out what this portal business is about.

Professor Jill Trumbull-Harris

January 18, 2008

That’s right, our prosecutor who prostituted herself at the trial of Charles Stephano is teaching her nefarious methods to some of the brightest kids in America. Still, it’s really hard to conjour what combinations of assets and luck made her a college professor at a tier one schools before she was even a law school graduate.

Seems that she parlayed her undergraduate experience with mock trials into a position as the Founder of a similar program at Northwestern and became the Director of the Summer Undergraduate Mock Trial Institute recruiting students from all over the Nation including Penn and Harvard. She was officially named Adjunct Professor of Communications for the years 1998 to 2001 which began one year after her undergraduate graduation.

It was natural for her to parlay this experience into becoming a course assistant in Trial Advocacy and believe it or not Ethics. She and her professor would develop a working relationship that would become a major influence on her life. Based on this youthful experience, it was natural upon graduation that she became an Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy at The John Marshall Law School. When she moved to DC to work with the Fed’s she joined the faculty of George Washington University as an Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy.

That is an incredible meteoric rise in the academic world. Unfortunately for Jill, meteors are known to burn bright and move fast before disappearing into the night.

Youngerbabes.com – Hack This Site!

January 15, 2008

Whether you are a black or white hat, a hacker or cracker, part of the Christian thought police or a libertine who believes in pedophilia, youngerbabes.com is the site to hack for all of the following reason

1. It has a go to jail name where it being in your history is evidence of a predisposition to pedophilia.
2. Up to a week or so ago, it had pictures of young girls that would make Hannibal Lector dibble down his chin in hunger
3. The site has sweet young girls and abused young girls that would make a pedophile pink with lust. (careful they’re all from the National Archives of Hashed Kiddie Porn
4. The site was made in America and until last week it resided here. (It probably still is in the DC area with some tricky IP crap.)
5. It’s pretending to hide abroad.
6. Google documents three complaints for pedophilia but they operate with impunity from Cease and Desist actions.
7. They had the audacity to claim all models are 18 despite the charges of kiddie porn and Google’s dropping them from the search engine because of it.
8. It links to many other sites with go to jail type names that imply pedophilia
9. This site acts with an audaciousness that could only stem from legal immunity
10. Watch out, it is probably protected by the federal government as a law enforcement honeypot.

Youngerbabes.com has to retire or be taken down.