Archive for the ‘Content Filtering.’ Category

Independence Day

July 22, 2008

This case reminds me of the movie “Independence Day” where the space ship lays dormant for 50 years and all of a sudden jumps to life. Well, this hasn’t taken quite as long. I stopped writing in April and and nothing much happened with traffic dwindling down to 40 hits a day. Actually, I surprised it was that much with no new posts and Google content filtering there was very little reason for even my most devoted fans to come back. Then last week all hell broke loose on all fronts.

The lawyer for the defense called. He had a virus which he and his trial expert didn’t know how to get rid of. I mean, that’s sick. Here we have the trial of this century invoking the Patriot Act, Protected lying Federal witnesses, planted evidence and a mockery of a trial and the lawyer and his expert can’t protect a computer from a virus or get rid of it once it’s infected. The lawyer on this case is a fucking disgrace but that’s another story.

This provoked me to check my blog and all of a sudden I find my traffic has jumped four fold and I found the reason why. Apparently, the feds have a new tactic in kiddie porn prosecutions. instead of fighting my blog, they and Google seem to have embraced it as a weapon in the war on kiddie porn. When you now Google a kiddie porn site, I have commented on or even visit Alexa to find out about it my comments are well represented in the top 10. Actually, this is a smart move on the part of the Feds. Regular readers know that this blog has documented all the involuntary ways to get kiddie porn on your computer. But for true perverts, that defense is gone.

I mean, if you Google young-models.org and still go there after reading comments that the site is illegal, deserved to be nuked and is blatant born in America kiddie porn from the Federal Archives, you not only deserve to go to jail but deserve to go to hell as well.

Google Dorking 4 Kiddie Porn

February 11, 2008

When you Google Dork for porn, you can never be quite sure of the result you will get and not all Google based searches are created equal.  Now while Google dorking for kiddie porn sites with one search I did hit the mother load of hundreds of sites where every page of 10 results had a warning at the bottom of the page that some pages had been removed because of kiddie porn complaints.  When I clicked on the complete URL, most pages came up dead ends or redirected to advertising content.  However, when I just put the main domain name in the URL locator, many of the sites showed suspiciously young girls with a disclaimer they were all 18 and many had a ucj cookie the sames as other “go to jail” type sites. Usually, a page would yield three  domains suspected of hosting Kiddie Porn.

I thought that the search was;

site:*/cgi-bin/ucj/

Now the reason I couldn’t initially repeat the experiment was because when I went back I tried to play it safe. I went to scroogle.org and did my annomyuous surfing only to turn up a list of crap domains which took you to them phony advertising dumps. Next, I used Firefox and killed all cookies only to get the same list of crap.

I tried Lynx on a live cd and got a very evil list but I was forced to yield to cookies to get in.  Well, once your screwed, you may as well go all the way.  When, I allowed cookies in the machine, bam I was back to the Mother of all Kiddie Porn Portals – straight from the fine folks at Google.

The only problem is they will have this search and my cookies on file until 2038 when it finally expires. 

You know you can trust Google to give you any result you want.  You just can’t do it annomyously.

Beyond Google – Viral Traffic

February 6, 2008

If your discussing matters which are touchy to our government, you really have to expect their best effort at suppressing the information. It’s no secret that Google is cooperating with China in suppressing knowledge on a broad range of topics. It’s also obvious that as a socially responsible corporation, they probably hide or fail to list content on a broad range of topics. When they fail to list a site page, they sometimes let you know that the supporting documentation is at chillingeffects.org but only when the content is totally illegal.

For legal but sensitive material, they don’t really acknowledge content filtering but when caught, just release a statement about unintended errors which led to technical difficulties and an inability to find a specific YouTube movie etc. In our particular case, serious content filtering started at my Fatsavage blog with a condemnation of a known kiddie porn site, youngerbabes.com, which is still online. The technical proof of content filtering is offered on this blog.

Of course the immediate effect of content filtering is that your traffic gets slammed and you lose visitors, but there is an obvious solution, just keep on writing. My traffic at fatsavage has started rising again, and the site is ranked in the top million of 20 million sites monitored by quantcast.com. Yeah, I get more traffic if I avoid censored topics, but I’m not a singing caged bird.

Interestingly, my new exulted status is almost independent of Google referrals (Correlation Coefficient 33%) and much more dependent on loyal visitors.

This post is being published at both Fatsavge and Tigerstail Blogs, not because I’m lazy, but because I want the information to get out. If Google were bothering to feed my blog, this would almost certainly get this post de-listed for laziness or plagiarism. However, since they are no longer doing a great job for my traffic, it doesn’t matter which rules I break.

Google Content Filtering is Specific!

February 1, 2008

You might expect that a search engine developed by a brilliant guy (Sergi Brin) attending a fantastic school (Stanford) would be cerebral and that is the case. College professors who study such things say the top 5 posts on any search term at Google are far superior in content, spelling and grammar than the bottom and that fresh verbal content gives a higher rating than superior graphics.

With this in mind, it’s easy to see how the Fatsavage blog makes it up to the top ten when discussing kiddie porn. After all, there is very little poetic prose or any kind of prose at all. The vocabulary is quite restricted and in the range that a chimpanzee could learn. Youngerbabes.com has about 250 unique words on the home page and a well educated chimp can have a vocabulary between 250 and 500 words.

Still, this is a site which is in the top 4300 in the world and about the same as thehun.net (3900) or elephantlist.com (3200) which are clearly legal porn portals. Putting this popularity into numbers, one million people a month visit this site and about 4000 are addicted enough to visit daily. (Don’t worry, I’m sure there all being observed and will get a visit from the man in the near future.) Joking aside, that happens to be about the number of child pornography cases tried each year, so you do know where they find them.

Thus, it’s easy to conceive that a highly negative post about youngerbabes.com gets about about 1000 hits in the two days after posting before it is filtered out of existence and never gets more than one or two a day after that. My two favorite and very popular rants which got virtually no traffic after the first three days are:

Youngerbabes Suck Bad

Youngerbabes, A curse on everyone Involved!

Of course, linking to them will relegate this post to Search Siberia, despite the interest in the subject. Seems to me if the Government and Google really wanted to restrict access to illegal kiddie porn, there would be a bigger effort to get out the word on youngerbabes.com

On the other hand, if this is a government Honeypot tracking domestic and foreign nationals, then there would be a very focused effort to filter out negative comments which warn people off.

Well, it’s your life so you can decide.

Jill Trumbull-Harris, Total Failure

January 28, 2008

Well it didn’t seem to piss anybody off or result in content filtering when I criticized poor Jill so while I’m in a site rebuilding mode, I may as well crap on the persecutor of Charles Stephano, Jill Trumball-Harris.

So how could anybody call poor Jill a total failure? – easy it’s simply a matter of Goals and Values.

In Mock Trial’s, every law school wants a winning program and everybody wants to knock off the tier one schools. Jill has parleyed her expertise into developing programs, writing a book and managing a winning team. Of course this led to her teaching assistant position and to her becomming an adjunct professor in tier one schools. Now as pointed out, in a previous post – her mentor believes that lawyers can’t, don’t and shouldn’t have to tell the whole truth or at least minimally be able to withhold the truth when it helps the client.

Now I supposed that this advice is fine for Mock Trials where no one really gets hurt and perhaps even for a vigorous defense when trying to establish a doubt in the juror’s minds but this cavilier attitude is simply not allowed for the prosecution. Seems when Jill took the job she swore her oath to become an agent of the court and a seeker of truth. Quite simply she is not supposed to persecute people but to become a fact finder to establish either a persons Guilt or innocence.

One way or the other, she has a conflict in her life which cannot be ethically resolved. Mock Trials are as close to a blood sport as Tier One Lawyers are ever likely to come and the job is to win at all costs. When a prosecutor carries this attitude into a courthouse, we have a travesty of Justice like the Duke Hockey team. If I wasn’t such a geek and sat through a three week trial, poor Jill might have got away with her shit. As it stands, her prostituting herself may be acceptable to a Republican Justice Department but should be an automatic disqualified for an academic position.

Google Content Filtering!

January 27, 2008

Once again, I seemed to have pissed a lot of important people off. My site traffic dropped by over 70% and I was curious as to why. I had written a few insulting posts on Prosecutor Jill Trumbull-Harris (with a few more to come). Google lists one in the top ten, MSN has two, Yahoo is the top 3 and Ask has zero. Traffic is steady but weak and those who have a need can find the information.

Likewise I checked traffic and and rankings for young-models.org which is a kiddie porn site and had top ten listings in Yahoo, Ask and Google. Once again, I couldn’t see any evidence of content filtering.

Life got really interesting when I checked on youngerbabes.com! Now it seems once again, I got slammed with a huge drop in traffic on my most recent posting which coincided with a huge drop in Google referrals. The last time this happened, I had not yet figured out how to prove that it was content filtering. Now I am presenting the supportive mathematical arguments at tigerstail.wordpress.com

It’s not like I’m really opposed to content filtering. It’s pretty obvious that a manual on purifying uranium and building a nuclear weapon is not going to be online. On the other hand, why would anyone want to block a Christmas wish to Charles Stephano or warnings that youngerbabes.com is a really nasty kiddie porn site. (first blocked post)