The Judge Responds

After a lifetime of public service, Judge Finch has decided to retire but he is still working until the very end of his career and beyond. He will remain a part time Judge after his nominal retirement date of August, 2008. Thus, I am really surprised at the speed of his response. His reply was dictated on April 14, 2008 for a document he recieved on April 10, 2008.

His response is as follows:

April 14, 2008

Dear [FatSavage]:

Thank you for your letter of April 8, 2008.

Since this letter is not properly before the Court as part of its proceedings, I am forced to return the same to you.

Thank you for your attention in this regard.

Sincerely,

Raymond L. Finch

The letter is obviously in standard form English which is why I’m surprised to find that I am clueless as to what the hell he means. Since the judge knows me personally and we occasionally bump into each other, I’ll have to ask him privately when I see him again. (not very often)

Oh well after a year of study, I could live with a clear cut loss or better yet, a win but in my mind, an indeterminate term in purgatory with no decision is worse than an eternity in hell.

A Final Chapter????

Dear Reader,

I am posting a copy of the cover letter for a package that I have sent to Judge Raymond Finch documenting Shannon Perkins perjury. Pretty much it proves what regular visitors to this blog already know: Federal Expert Witnesses lie to get a conviction, and the Attorney on this case is a fuck-up. Meanwhile Charles Stephano rots in Jail and the expert moves on to bigger and better cases.

The principle point I would like to convey to all is that computer evidence is not immutable when presented by the Feds. You can find evidence of keystroke loggers, spyware and shutdown programs. You can also find the trail of planted evidence. If you can explore all of this “secret information” at a trial and the expert lies to get a conviction, you stand an excellent chance of using the logs to find evidence of perjury and also setting up for a dismissal or retrial if you don’t win.

I will probably pass this along to CNN and the Electronic Freedom Foundation to see if they can bring this type of prosecution to the light of day. While it’s common knowledge in our community among Judges and Lawyers that Federal Experts lie, I believe the general public doesn’t even dream of how widespread and pervasive the practice is.

At any rate, I have worked on this for about a year and am bored with it. As I have unfortunately discovered; resistance is futile, knowledge is soporific.

Sincerely,

The FatSavage

PS I’m glad I’m old – it really does make it easier to cope with the Brave New World of electronic surveillance of all Americans

Google Dorking 4 Kiddie Porn

When you Google Dork for porn, you can never be quite sure of the result you will get and not all Google based searches are created equal.  Now while Google dorking for kiddie porn sites with one search I did hit the mother load of hundreds of sites where every page of 10 results had a warning at the bottom of the page that some pages had been removed because of kiddie porn complaints.  When I clicked on the complete URL, most pages came up dead ends or redirected to advertising content.  However, when I just put the main domain name in the URL locator, many of the sites showed suspiciously young girls with a disclaimer they were all 18 and many had a ucj cookie the sames as other “go to jail” type sites. Usually, a page would yield three  domains suspected of hosting Kiddie Porn.

I thought that the search was;

site:*/cgi-bin/ucj/

Now the reason I couldn’t initially repeat the experiment was because when I went back I tried to play it safe. I went to scroogle.org and did my annomyuous surfing only to turn up a list of crap domains which took you to them phony advertising dumps. Next, I used Firefox and killed all cookies only to get the same list of crap.

I tried Lynx on a live cd and got a very evil list but I was forced to yield to cookies to get in.  Well, once your screwed, you may as well go all the way.  When, I allowed cookies in the machine, bam I was back to the Mother of all Kiddie Porn Portals - straight from the fine folks at Google.

The only problem is they will have this search and my cookies on file until 2038 when it finally expires. 

You know you can trust Google to give you any result you want.  You just can’t do it annomyously.

Beyond Google - Viral Traffic

If your discussing matters which are touchy to our government, you really have to expect their best effort at suppressing the information. It’s no secret that Google is cooperating with China in suppressing knowledge on a broad range of topics. It’s also obvious that as a socially responsible corporation, they probably hide or fail to list content on a broad range of topics. When they fail to list a site page, they sometimes let you know that the supporting documentation is at chillingeffects.org but only when the content is totally illegal.

For legal but sensitive material, they don’t really acknowledge content filtering but when caught, just release a statement about unintended errors which led to technical difficulties and an inability to find a specific YouTube movie etc. In our particular case, serious content filtering started at my Fatsavage blog with a condemnation of a known kiddie porn site, youngerbabes.com, which is still online. The technical proof of content filtering is offered on this blog.

Of course the immediate effect of content filtering is that your traffic gets slammed and you lose visitors, but there is an obvious solution, just keep on writing. My traffic at fatsavage has started rising again, and the site is ranked in the top million of 20 million sites monitored by quantcast.com. Yeah, I get more traffic if I avoid censored topics, but I’m not a singing caged bird.

Interestingly, my new exulted status is almost independent of Google referrals (Correlation Coefficient 33%) and much more dependent on loyal visitors.

This post is being published at both Fatsavge and Tigerstail Blogs, not because I’m lazy, but because I want the information to get out. If Google were bothering to feed my blog, this would almost certainly get this post de-listed for laziness or plagiarism. However, since they are no longer doing a great job for my traffic, it doesn’t matter which rules I break.

Google Content Filtering is Specific!

You might expect that a search engine developed by a brilliant guy (Sergi Brin) attending a fantastic school (Stanford) would be cerebral and that is the case. College professors who study such things say the top 5 posts on any search term at Google are far superior in content, spelling and grammar than the bottom and that fresh verbal content gives a higher rating than superior graphics.

With this in mind, it’s easy to see how the Fatsavage blog makes it up to the top ten when discussing kiddie porn. After all, there is very little poetic prose or any kind of prose at all. The vocabulary is quite restricted and in the range that a chimpanzee could learn. Youngerbabes.com has about 250 unique words on the home page and a well educated chimp can have a vocabulary between 250 and 500 words.

Still, this is a site which is in the top 4300 in the world and about the same as thehun.net (3900) or elephantlist.com (3200) which are clearly legal porn portals. Putting this popularity into numbers, one million people a month visit this site and about 4000 are addicted enough to visit daily. (Don’t worry, I’m sure there all being observed and will get a visit from the man in the near future.) Joking aside, that happens to be about the number of child pornography cases tried each year, so you do know where they find them.

Thus, it’s easy to conceive that a highly negative post about youngerbabes.com gets about about 1000 hits in the two days after posting before it is filtered out of existence and never gets more than one or two a day after that. My two favorite and very popular rants which got virtually no traffic after the first three days are:

Youngerbabes Suck Bad

Youngerbabes, A curse on everyone Involved!

Of course, linking to them will relegate this post to Search Siberia, despite the interest in the subject. Seems to me if the Government and Google really wanted to restrict access to illegal kiddie porn, there would be a bigger effort to get out the word on youngerbabes.com

On the other hand, if this is a government Honeypot tracking domestic and foreign nationals, then there would be a very focused effort to filter out negative comments which warn people off.

Well, it’s your life so you can decide.

Google Hacking For Kiddie Porn!

In order to really use Google Hacking techniques, you have to have a knowledge base that directs your search and helps you recognize when you reach a destination. While checking on hq-teens.com to see if the are still on line feeding images of abused anorexic young girls (they are), I also checked the source code and was reminded of the ucj cookie and cgi image feed.

Since all the images are fed from links containing a /ucj/ directory, I figured I’d do a long shot and Google

link:*/ucj/* which amazingly worked better than the Google “site” or “inurl” commands and led to two sites. One was a dead kiddie porn site and the other www.ucj.com Interestingly this is a site which cannot be explored through the front door because entry is blocked to the home page. The page I found is a manual for the ucj porn delivery system and the backdoor is wide open.

The URL, www.ucj.com/docs/ucj45/c.html is still live and for those who care you can move up the directory tree by eliminating the c.html and then the ucj45 drectory until you reach docs where you are once again are shut out. Now recognizing the weak link, you can explore the site with

site:ucj.com and find

www.ucj.com/features.html which takes you to a list of 1951 porn sites some of which contain kiddie porn because some known kiddie porn sites are on the list.

Now searching through 1951 sites for kiddie porn is a pretty inefficient uses of time but this line of thought allowed me to target my Google Search and zero in on the really nasty sites with one simple entry into the search bar.

Jill Trumbull-Harris, Total Failure

Well it didn’t seem to piss anybody off or result in content filtering when I criticized poor Jill so while I’m in a site rebuilding mode, I may as well crap on the persecutor of Charles Stephano, Jill Trumball-Harris.

So how could anybody call poor Jill a total failure? - easy it’s simply a matter of Goals and Values.

In Mock Trial’s, every law school wants a winning program and everybody wants to knock off the tier one schools. Jill has parleyed her expertise into developing programs, writing a book and managing a winning team. Of course this led to her teaching assistant position and to her becomming an adjunct professor in tier one schools. Now as pointed out, in a previous post - her mentor believes that lawyers can’t, don’t and shouldn’t have to tell the whole truth or at least minimally be able to withhold the truth when it helps the client.

Now I supposed that this advice is fine for Mock Trials where no one really gets hurt and perhaps even for a vigorous defense when trying to establish a doubt in the juror’s minds but this cavilier attitude is simply not allowed for the prosecution. Seems when Jill took the job she swore her oath to become an agent of the court and a seeker of truth. Quite simply she is not supposed to persecute people but to become a fact finder to establish either a persons Guilt or innocence.

One way or the other, she has a conflict in her life which cannot be ethically resolved. Mock Trials are as close to a blood sport as Tier One Lawyers are ever likely to come and the job is to win at all costs. When a prosecutor carries this attitude into a courthouse, we have a travesty of Justice like the Duke Hockey team. If I wasn’t such a geek and sat through a three week trial, poor Jill might have got away with her shit. As it stands, her prostituting herself may be acceptable to a Republican Justice Department but should be an automatic disqualified for an academic position.

Google Content Filtering!

Once again, I seemed to have pissed a lot of important people off. My site traffic dropped by over 70% and I was curious as to why. I had written a few insulting posts on Prosecutor Jill Trumbull-Harris (with a few more to come). Google lists one in the top ten, MSN has two, Yahoo is the top 3 and Ask has zero. Traffic is steady but weak and those who have a need can find the information.

Likewise I checked traffic and and rankings for young-models.org which is a kiddie porn site and had top ten listings in Yahoo, Ask and Google. Once again, I couldn’t see any evidence of content filtering.

Life got really interesting when I checked on youngerbabes.com! Now it seems once again, I got slammed with a huge drop in traffic on my most recent posting which coincided with a huge drop in Google referrals. The last time this happened, I had not yet figured out how to prove that it was content filtering. Now I am presenting the supportive mathematical arguments at tigerstail.wordpress.com

It’s not like I’m really opposed to content filtering. It’s pretty obvious that a manual on purifying uranium and building a nuclear weapon is not going to be online. On the other hand, why would anyone want to block a Christmas wish to Charles Stephano or warnings that youngerbabes.com is a really nasty kiddie porn site. (first blocked post)

Young-Models.org, Hack This Site!

If you are a true pedophile, this site is almost guaranteed to contain all the hashed kiddie porn Pictures from the National Archive of Kiddie Porn Picks. If your a Christian, Google has had four complaints that this site is a kiddie porn server and pages have been removed. My experience is a lot more personal.

At the trial of Charles Stephano, the expert witnesses all parroted the claim that anybody who Googled “young models” was probably a pedophile and as evidence, this site was one of many identified as having names which were designed to attract pedophiles. In this particular case they offered a direct link between a known and hashed (secretly marked) kiddie porn  image that was definitely served from young-models.org according to their experts.

Reasons to hack this site include:

1. It has been on-line since July 3, 2004 despite their being a bonafide kiddie porn server.

2. The Feds are aware of their being a kiddie porn server from Google complaints and testimony by federal agents at a federal trial.

3. This is purely an American invention from San Jose California.

4. Throughout the trial this site was on line and still is today.

5. It has some of the nastiest kiddie porn and and the ability to flood your system with more images than you can mentally process before pulling the plug. They end up in cache memory without you actually ever getting to see them.

6. They also dump machine crippling malware on the unsuspecting victim.

7. It is still online today and under certain certain circumstances you can still suffer the effects of 5 and 6.

8. Under other circumstances, you can get a controlled delivery of very nasty kiddie porn which really should be illegal.

This is a site with absolutely no redeeming quality other than it’s free so the dumb asses that run it can’t even claim a profit motive.

Free porn is truly a characteristic off a law enforcement honeypot run by Homeland Security under the Patriot Act.

Jill Trumbull-Harris Wrote the Book!

Twenty-two year old Jill Trumbull-Harris certainly knew how to turn her undergraduate Mock Trial Loss into a winning career. First, she got herself appointed as Coach of the undergraduate Mock Trial Team and parlayed that into creating the summer program and becoming the first Director. This led to her being an Adjunct Professor and later a Teaching Assistant of Trial Advocacy.

Along the line she started working very closely with Professor Steven Lubet and got credit for being a major researcher on a paper presentation entitled: EXPERT WITNESSES: ETHICS AND PROFESSIONALISM. Seems that Ms Trumbul-Harris has no excuse for ignoring unethical behavior by a novice expert (Shannon Perkins) out to score her first win. This close working relationship with Professor Lubet continued with the publication of a jointly authored book based on Trumbull-Harris’ hands on experience and Professor Lubet’s exulted status. It’s not ever undergraduate who gets to co-author a Book on Mock Trials: Preparing, Presenting and Winning Your Case with a world renown author.

In addition to working as a researcher for Professor Lubet on the Ethic’s Paper, she was also a Teaching Assistant in Ethics so it’s informative to note the title of his September 2002 book, Nothing but the Truth: Why Trial Lawyers Don’t, Can’t, and Shouldn’t Have to Tell the Whole Truth.

Even with the funky title, Professor Lubet has one caveat for Lawyers, DON’T LIE and in his paper on expert witnesses offers another for Lawyers, DON’T LET YOUR EXPERT’S LIE.

Her school tried to teach her right from wrong so any legal transgressions are an artifact of her own invention.

She is now a Professor at George Washington teaching a future Generation of lawyers her method of winning at all cost.

Go Jill Go.